Cascade Effects: Everything Is Connected

You may have heard of “The Butterfly Effect”, where the flutter of a single butterfly’s wings can cause a tornado somewhere in the world. The theory suggests that a single occurrence, no matter how small can cause a massive change in the universe. Cascade effects follow a similar concept, where a change at point A, can cause a domino effect, changing everything else around it, sometimes having bigger consequences than you can imagine.

Understanding The Concept

Newton told us that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Especially in nature, every action has a consequence that carries forward to form a chain reaction. These consequential effects are what we term a ‘cascade’, as the action ripples to affect, positively or negatively, all else around it.

Cascade effects can occur directly, between two interacting trophic levels¹, or indirectly, through longer chain effects. Take for example a piece of plastic bag littered out of a moving car. The direct effect of that would be a form of plastic pollution, littering or just an unsightly piece of plastic trash by the road. Looking at it in a larger scale, that same piece of plastic could get washed down the road when it rains, into a drain. The drain leads the plastic bag further into the sewage and later into a river. The ducks or fish swimming in the river could possibly get caught in that plastic bag, get strangled or suffocate. This would be an indirect cascade effect.

It might seem a little far-fetched, but you’d be surprised how complex and interlinked the natural system actually is. Let’s explore some real live examples of cascade effects in the environment.

Plastics In The Garden

Microplastics are very small plastic particles. They are defined as plastic particles smaller than 5mm. A recent study in Mexico by Lwanga et al (2017), found microplastics in the soil of home gardens. Tiny plastics that are barely visible in the garden, what damage can it really do?

Well, the paper found evidence of the microplastics being consumed by earthworms in the garden. Earthworms consume the soil and so accidentally consume microplastics too. We don’t know what eating plastics does to earthworms, but I can’t imagine it would be anything good. It doesn’t stop there! The earthworms (and some soil) get eaten by home-grown chickens. The study showed that microplastics were found to accumulate in the gizzard² of the chickens. Plastics were also found in chicken poop, which means some plastics remain in the chicken, while others pass through. Fun fact: Humans eat chicken gizzard. So wouldn’t it be very possible that these microplastics could well be in our bodies too?

Microplastics come off of clothes, cosmetic products and industrial processes. Watch the video below to learn more about plastics and microplastics found in the sea.

 

Manta Rays Need Diverse Forests

Why would manta rays care about forest diversity? Well, this trophic cascade doesn’t just travel down the food chain but involves an entire ecosystem, maybe even two! The study by McCauley et al (2012) took place at Palmyra Atoll, an island off of Hawaii, where the native forest was being replaced with coconut palms for oil production.

Turns out the decrease in forest diversity from multiple tree species into a single-species tree plantation, didn’t bode well with the seabirds³. The seabirds preferred nesting in more diverse forest canopies. So this resulted in fewer seabirds nesting in the forest. This also means less seabird poo in the forest. FYI, bird poo is very rich in nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus, which are very important fertilizers.

So there were fewer birds and so less bird poo on the island soil. This wasn’t an issue on the island itself but it was an issue for the plankton (which are microscopic floating plants and animals) that lived in the sea. The bird poo rich soil from the island would get washed down into the ocean with rain. This excess flowing water is termed ‘runoff’. Less nutrient in the soil runoff meant the plankton were not receiving enough fertilizer to grow in abundance. Manta rays feed on plankton. So lower plankton abundance resulted in the decrease of manta rays.

Crazy how planting coconut trees can reduce manta ray populations, right? The poster below simplifies this complex trophic cascade.

Forests to Manta Ray Infographic

Again, we see how human interference with the natural ecosystem (i.e.. plastic pollution and coconut palm plantations) can set off a chain reaction that, unsurprisingly, does more damage than it does good. So bear in mind that our ecosystem is a lot more complex and interconnected that it appears. Human activities, especially, have a knack for setting off massive chain reactions that could possibly alter the world as we know it.

So the next time you think that your action won’t affect the environment, think again. 

 

Cover image from Pixabay.


¹ A trophic level refers to the level or position in a food chain or trophic pyramid, where the organisms on the same level have a similar feeding mode. The base of the trophic pyramid (trophic level 1) is comprised of plants, followed by herbivores in trophic level 2, predators (those that feed on herbivores) in trophic level 3 with carnivores and apex predators occupying trophic levels 4 and 5. The final trophic level is occupied by decomposers (i.e.. detritivores).

² The gizzard is a strong, muscular stomach present in birds that grinds food.

³ Seabirds are birds that are adapted to live within the marine environment. They often rely on the sea for food and spend most of their lives near or at sea. Examples of seabirds include penguins, puffins, seagulls, pelicans and albatrosses. 


References:
Lwanga, E.H., Vega, J.M., Quej, V.K. Chi, J.A., Lucero, S.C., Chi, C., Segura, E.G., Gertsen, H., Salánki, T., van der Ploeg, M., Koelmans, A.A. and Geissen, V. (2017). Field evidence for transfer of plastic debris along a terrestrial food chain, Scientific Reports, 7: 14071. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14588-2
McCauley, D.J., DeSalles, P.A., Young, H.S., Dunbar, R.B., Dirzo, R., Mills, M.M. and Micheli, F. (2012). From wing to wing: the persistence of long ecological interaction chains in less-disturbed ecosystems, Scientific Reports, 2: 409. doi:10.1038/srep00409
Ocean Confetti! (2010). [Video]. Minute Earth, May 2010. Available at https://youtu.be/qVoFeELi_vQ

Paper, Plastic or Polystyrene?

We consume various products made from paper, plastic and polystyrene foam on a daily basis, especially cups! Which one is better for the planet? Is paper really greener than plastic? Why is polystyrene so bad?

Polystyrene foam is also commonly known as Styrofoam. However, Styrofoam is a trademarked brand that produces polystyrene products. To know more about the difference, watch this video: Styrofoam vs. Expanded Polystyrene Foam

Is Polystyrene Bad for the Environment? 

Polystyrene is made from fossil fuels. It’s got chemicals like benzene in it which is bad for the environment. It takes up less energy and water to be manufactured than paper does. It’s a good insulator (great for hot drinks!) and it’s cheap, but also takes between 500 years and never to decompose in our natural environment (yikes!). So yes, it’s not the best thing for our planet, in terms of waste.

vessels-1972235_1920

Paper vs. Plastic

Paper is made from trees. That isn’t necessarily a bad thing because a) it’s a renewable resource¹, and b) it’s okay to cut some trees to make paper. What’s dangerous is the excessive and wasteful use of paper. Paper uses more water and energy when being manufactured than plastic (fact!) and is more expensive to recycle than plastic (another fact!). It decomposes naturally in our environment (way better than plastic or polystyrene) although it can take a really long time to decompose in landfills.

Plastic is made from fossil fuels. That’s a non-renewable resource². Plastic is cheaper and more durable than paper, however, it also doesn’t decompose naturally in our environment. Biodegradable³ plastics can decompose naturally but only under the “right” environmental conditions, which means it might not decompose all that well in a landfill.

Paper First, then Plastic and Polystyrene Never

Each material has its own pros and cons — from its birth at production up till the end of its life-cycle, decomposition. When it comes to looking out for the environment, I would say as far as disposable items go, paper is best, simply because it degrades more easily, isn’t made of harmful chemicals, is safe if accidentally consumed and can’t choke an animal to death (on land or in sea).

If using paper isn’t possible, plastic is okay too, if recycled! Plastic is durable and for long-term use, can be more suitable than paper. There’s no need for polystyrene in the 21st century. The chemicals involved, the waste produced, it cannot degrade, it can kill animals and humans (major choke hazard!) and it cannot be recycled. Polystyrene is best avoided at all costs. 

Reduce, Reuse and Recycle!

Paper is great! Plastic is evil. Well, that’s what everyone says and they’re not wrong about all the horrible impacts plastic has on our planet but plastic isn’t actually evil. It’s more on how we USE plastic that gives it such a bad reputation. Our over-consumption of plastic, “disposable” lifestyles and lack of environmental awareness is the reason we need to make drastic changes to our way of life.

It all boils down to behaviour and mindsets. Being environmentally aware is important because whether it is paper or plastic, the goal is hurt the environment less. Reduce your consumption of these items. Use less napkins, bring reusable grocery bags (plastic, cloth, whatever!), bring your own coffee cups, reuse that take-away food plastic container and recycle old papers.

You don’t need to live a 100% plastic-free life to make a change. You can start by removing polystyrene from your every day life and reducing your daily consumption of paper and plastic.

It’s a small individual effort that translates into a massive cumulative difference.

 

For more information on this topic, follow the links below.

 

Image from Pixabay.


¹Renewable resources are goods that are unlimited and can be replenished naturally over a short period of time. Examples include solar, wind, water and biomass. Trees can be planted and grown, therefore, can be replenished within our lifetime. 

²Non-renewable resources are goods that are limited and either cannot be replenished or take a very long time to replenish. Examples include coal, nuclear, oil and gas. Fossil fuel can be fully used up and when we’ve used it up, we’ll have no more to use (not for millions of years to come). 

³Biodegradable items are goods that can be decomposed by bacteria or other living organisms naturally. To know more, visit: What Does Biodegradable Mean?

 


References:
Bell, K and Cave, S. (2011). Comparison of Environmental Impact of Plastic, Paper and Cloth Bags. Accessed at http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/globalassets/documents/raise/ publications/2011/environment/3611.pdf
Chait, J. (2017). [Website]. The Balance: What Does Biodegradable Mean? Accessed at https://www.thebalance.com/what-does-biodegradable-mean-2538213
Driftaway Coffee (2016). [Website]. Styrofoam vs. Paper: Which Cups are Better for the Environment? Accessed at https://driftaway.coffee/styrofoam-vs-paper-cups/
Dunay, A. (2017). [Website]. Sciencing: Styrofoam vs. Plastic Cups. Accessed at https://sciencing.com/styrofoam-vs-plastic-cups-12400119.html
EPSFoamPro (2018). [Video]. What is the Difference between Styrofoam and Expanded Polystyrene EPS Foam? (October 6, 2009). Accessed at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qSSchUSbyY  
McGrath, J. (2018). [Website]. How Stuff Works: Which is More Environmentally Friendly: Paper or Plastic? Accessed at https://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/green-science/paper-plastic1.htm